Thursday, June 26, 2008

1968

There is plenty of analysis and even nostalgia for the for the year that for better AND worse set the West on its current path.

As I think of times and places of importance in my life, 1968 ranks high. I was 14 and living down the road from the very counterculture dominated Guilford College. In the middle of the then very traditional North Carolina, this "hippie freak show" was a sight to see. See it, I did. Daily, I would bicycle there to hang out and listen to local bands such as "Electric Lather" as they did their renditions of "new" songs such as "Happiness is a Warm Gun" or "Stray Cat Blues". It amazed me that anyone had the audacity to play the sacrosanct songs of the Beatles or Stones.

For my 1968 birthday, I was given my first guitar, a "Silvertone" (Sears) acoustic. I'd haul this instrument of torture with strings that seemed to be at least an inch above the fretboard everywhere. One friend, Alan Thornton, who later would become a guitarist for "Nantucket", taught me my first riff, "Wipe Out". Later, when I brought over an amazing sounding 45, "Sunshine of Your Love", he figured it out and taught it to me too.

It was the politics of the time and place that also caught my attention. Guilford students were routinely protesting in the streets of the small town of Guilford (now part of Greensboro). Vietnam was, of course, the main issue. However, even our local barbershop was the target of a protest when its barbers said to a reporter that they couldn't and wouldn't cut a black man's hair. The barbershop was boycotted for weeks. However, the impact a bunch of longhairs boycotting a barbershop was minimal.

It was the quest for individual freedom (you know,"life, liberty and the pursuit happiness"), the anti authoritarian and decentralized vision of the "good" government, that appealed to me then and now. This was the more libertarian and even conservative side of the counterculture. The term "conservative hippie" is appropriate and not an oxymoron within this context.

On the other hand, the counterculture collectivists and cultural Marxists (who would spawn political correctness)of the hard left, held no promise to me. When Johnny Lennon sang "if you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao, you ain't going to make it with anyone, anyhow", it was "alright" by me.

It was McGovernite liberalism AND elements of countercultural libertarianism that held sway in my mind for years.

In another time and place, Philadelphia, 1988, the liberal part of my 1968 weltanschauung was shattered. I had moved back to Philly, and my wife and I were renovating a boarded up graffiti covered house. There, in my grandmother's old neighborhood, Kensington, which once proudly boasted the moniker, "workshop of the world", reality collided with liberal theory. There, the liberal political policies and programs that I thought would usher in the "new age", had wrecked the old neighborhood. Drug dealers and junkies "did their thing". And, each new government program delivered by parasitic ward healers, seemed to eat away at what was left of the neighborhood's social fabric. Even worse, a de facto coalition of liberal activists, real estate brokers and drug dealers,(each pursuing their own very different agendas), were united against people like us. We were to them, "evil gentrifiers", to be stopped no matter what. They won.

As for the legacy of '68, I've kept a guitar as a constant companion over the years. In yet another time and place, Washington, D.C., 1985, a guitar even played matchmaker when I met my future wife while playing it in a park.

Politically, the more libertarian conservative side of the counterculture still remains with me. I strongly oppose creeping authoritarianism in our government and the increasingly centralized bureaucratic control of our lives.

Many other aspects of the '68 social and political revolution, however, did serious damage. Much of the pre-1968 American tradition that I grew up with, is gone forever. Now, as a father struggling to keep the more insidious spin offs of '68 away from my daughter, my nostalgia grows for a time and place before 1968.

Friday, June 20, 2008

Political Commercials Go To The Dogs

Mark Funkhouser, mayor of Kansas City, is no stranger to controversy. The developers love to hate him and the International County/ City Management Association (ICMA -- basically a town manager union) has profiled his conflicts with the Kansas City town manager -- rooting (surprise) for the town manager. He's an interesting pol who just might be doing what he was elected to do.

He used this great commercial during his election campaign which is linked below. (It's set up a bit different and you just click on "menu" at the right bottom of the video to start.)
http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid595556248/bclid596410507/bctid595138480

Thursday, June 19, 2008

A Wake Up Call From Ross Perot

If you are like me, you are very worried about where our country is headed. Ross Perot was right back in the 90s and much of what he warned about has become true. We should listen to him now for a change. He is back with his charts at: http://perotcharts.com/

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Jeremiah Wright Meets Willie Horton

Right now, as I blog away, I'm sure that there is a camera whirring away (well, they don't whir anymore, but you get the picture) making an ad that hangs Barack Obama's preacher around his neck. We'll see Rev. Wright hourly throughout the fall making Willie Horton look like a choir boy. I'm also sure that similar ads will be running hanging the "Keating 5" around John McCain's neck. In the scheme of things, the weight of Rev. Wright will weigh heavier on Obama. Despite his statements to the contrary, Obama runs a major risk of being "swiftboated". In the eyes of many Americans, Rev. Wright is a racist, and Obama's guilt by association will be a major influence on how the majority of the electorate will vote.

Is this unfair? No, and I didn't think that the Genesis of "swiftboating" four years ago was unfair either. Enough facts were out there to make a case that a candidate for commander in chief was unfit for duty. The public has a right to know. The former gatekeepers of information, such as the TV network news broadcasters, weren't going to break the story. Therefore, I'm glad that other individuals stepped up to the plate and presented the information to the public.

Does this mean that I like the increasingly shrill tone of our political campaigns? No, but I'm not going to hold my breath and wait for a campaign where candidates debate how far they intend to stray from, or return to, the vision of our Republic outlined on the Federalist Papers. What we have now is imperfect, but certainly better than returning control of information to the mainstream media gatekeepers.

At the local level, things are different and the old information gatekeepers still hold sway. Because of the expense, no one is going to advertise in the Salisbury media market to win a Ridgely election. What is now starting to happen, however, is that free blogs and podcasts are providing local candidates the opportunity to make their case. The "everyman" running for office now has the means to an end run around expensive media markets and other information gatekeepers.

Some of this might be termed "negative" campaigning. However, candidates for local office are just as likely to be flawed and the public has the right to know the whole story about those seeking our votes. Because there is no media access, local politicians can often rest "on their laurels" earned from years in the community performing some service well with a local institution. Unfortunately, good service in one area of endeavor doesn't guarantee competence in the civic/political arena. For instance, if a local candidate or office holder states that "if we take out a loan, we won't be in debt anymore", they need to be held accountable. Candidates also need to have a means to get their message out and counter the all to common whispering campaigns that plague local politics. In all of this, blogs mean access and information for voters.

Technology in the service of democracy is never a bad thing.

Monday, May 5, 2008

Sour Grapes Vs. The Whole Truth!

It was heated at the Commissioner's meeting tonight and events pertaining to the recent election are still being discussed. At issue was the recent Town Manager "press release".

Some simple facts will set the story straight about the proposed '09 Budget "press release" from the Ridgely Town Manager the weekend before the election.

It all started when an email was sent out to all three Commissioners, 9:08 AM, April 24th, from the Town Manager, stating that "the attached has been forwarded to the media". Commissioner Gearhart emailed back that this was wrong and premature since the Commissioners hadn't even seen a draft of the budget, and asked him to retract the "press release". As the Town Manager was unavailable, Gearhart notified the press to clarify that the Commissioners hadn't yet seen this so called draft budget. Then, at 12:02 came another email from the Town Manager saying that "Chuck and Linda OKd". HOWEVER, you can't call such an email "vote" OFFICIAL, since such an action would VIOLATE the Maryland Open Meetings Act. The press did not print the Town Manager's "press release", writing that "to cover it would be imprudent".

The bottom line: WHY THE RUSH? If this "press release" was truly what it pretended to be, why would it matter if it was released the 24th or TODAY? Speaking of today, why wasn't the budget proposal in evidence at tonight's town meeting? The town meeting IS the time and place to consider this issue. The absence of any proposal tonight speaks volumes about the politics of the "press release".

Thursday, May 1, 2008

Progressive Politics

I'll use this May Day to reclaim the the term Progressive. All too often, it is a word that is used by the left and has collectivist connotations for many of us.

The Progressive movement at its height at the beginning of the 20th century included many Republicans and conservatives. Teddy Roosevelt, for example, was a leader of the Progressive movement. The focus on promoting the people's interests over large monopolistic corporations led to much legislation that we take for granted today.

Today, at the international, national and local levels, we find an array of forces and trends which are compromising the voice and interests of the average middle class American. For example, our jobs are being out sourced because of "free trade", while both legal and illegal immigrants come and take the remaining jobs. My own brother-in-law, a computer programmer, must watch as his American co-workers are forced to train "H-1B" visa immigrants to do their jobs. He is the last one left in his department, and has every reason to believe he'll be next.

We always need to look at who benefits from such phenomenon, and in all the above, it's the multi-national corporations and their insatiable need for cheap labor. The situation today is similar to the one a hundred years ago when corporate driven changes were threatening the social good.

Only a few lonely voices such as Ralph Nader on the left, or Pat Buchanan on the right, have consistently criticized the growing dispossession of Middle America. (Their common ground is intriguing, and despite their differences on social issues, could contain the seeds of a wide ranging progressive renewal.)However, few will now take on sacred corporate cows such as "free trade". And, when a mainstream figure like Lou Dobbs begins to raise his voice, look at how he's tarred and feathered as an extremist, isolationist, or even a racist. It's a hard road ahead for those fighting to regain control over our fate.

At the local level, I am gratified to see a functioning coalition composed of both conservatives and liberals, which I call progressive. It puts the people's interests ahead of the interests of corporations, developers and their administration allies.

Of course, many people voted in the recent election for a candidate that they simply liked or found personable and competent. However, many of us were aware of the stakes involved here. Many of us voted not only because we like Kathy Smith, but to keep an open, citizen oriented government, to serve the interests of the residents of Ridgely.

Monday, April 28, 2008

Kathy Smith Wins With The Most Votes In Ridgely History

You "Can't Buy Me Love(or elections)" in this piece of small town America. Kathy Smith has WON. The vote was 132 to 124 and her total is the highest in town history. The Progressive tradition which puts the people of our town first has triumphed! Jare Wallace must be smiling down on Ridgley tonight.

Sunday, April 27, 2008

Can't Buy Me Love (Or Elections)

This Commissioner election has witnessed unprecedented spending by candidate Portia Dunst. So far, there have been three Portia Dunst mailings. Besides the cost of printing, one was a letter at 41 cents postage per voter and the other two postcards at 26 cents per voter postage. With 432 registered voters that comes to $401.76.

Two of the mailings were promoting a campaign rally at the Medifast office in Ridgely. Despite all the expensive publicity, few showed.

Their type of lawn sign/posters are printed on both sides and cost (with their stands) more than $6.00 each. Dunst posters are everywhere in the town's public spaces and a few at homes. And, of course, there is the pick-up truck with the huge and expensive sign trolling about town. Total spending could easily top $1000.00. While this is astronomical for the average Ridgelyite, it's nothing when you have a corporation to lean on as Dunst, a manager of Medifast, does. Most of her signs are at a handful of employee houses and according to my observations, her main and nearly only campaign "volunteer" is an employee of Medifast.

In the past, I know that elections cost very little. Commissioner Gearhart spent about $40.00 for photocopies and signs -- volunteers on the "shoe leather express" did the rest. Today, I know Kathy Smith won't be spending anywhere near the amount of her opponent. She doesn't have a large corporation behind her. She does , however, have concerned Ridgely citizens and her supporters are helping out buying some single sided signs or making and painting larger signs, printing brochures on their PCs and going door to door.

In another unprecedented move, the Dunst campaign has been distributing a Town Manager "press release" that he rushed out Thursday. His statement is a budget proposal which the Commissioners of Ridgely have NEVER SEEN! Our town budget is $162.716.00 off because of money borrowed from the water/sewer fund. I don't think that the money to solve this problem magically showed up in Ridgely. What I do think, is that the Town Manager is playing politics in our Commissioner race, painting a rosy and UNREAL picture of the town's situation. The Town Manager's rush to get the "press release" out, and the Dunst campaign's massive (this was a huge and expensive color print job) use of it, shows that this episode is really about electing a cheerleader for the Town Manager to our Commission.

In terms of campaign spending, our town is witnessing a David and Goliath like struggle for what has been a progressive Commission seat. We the people still have a chance. We are still a small town, and the TRADITIONAL means of getting elected Commissioner will prevail over big money. Kathy Smith is our "David" and she's going to win the campaign battle for Ridgely!

Sunday, April 20, 2008

Kathy Smith For Commissioner

Often our elections are a sad choice between a lesser of two evils. This year is different. This year we have a choice with Kathy Smith. She is clearly committed to the residents and taxpayers of our town. She will be a strong commissioner dedicated to our best interests. Below is her letter to the citizens of Ridgely. Click on it to view it and click on "Ctrl. +" to enlarge it more.



c

Friday, April 18, 2008

Thank You Nancy Gearhart!

This press release is just in from my favorite commissioner:

RIDGELY TOWN COMMISSIONER NANCY GEARHART STEPS DOWN


“It’s time to take a break” says Nancy Gearhart. I have worked very hard serving Ridgely and its Citizens for six years and it’s time to take a break to be a mother and wife. As I look back, the accomplishments have been many through these challenging and changing times for Ridgely. It has not been easy as I have participated in countless workshops, seminars, and meetings and spent many long nights at the computer to prepare myself for the difficult decisions and to create alternative methods to address particular issues. Through all this I have always kept in mind that I am a Commissioner for the people. It is the citizens’ town and I represent them at the table!

I plan to stay involved in the town. There is much unfinished business that I need to follow through with. I will continue to participate in meetings of the various boards and commissions with the ever helpful town, county, and state staff. I would like to return to the Ridgely Planning & Zoning Commission when the opportunity arises.

I have not made it through these past 6 years alone. I thank all my loyal supporters for sticking by me through thick and thin and for voicing their opinions on issues to give me guidance. I’ll never be able to repay my babysitters and friends who have been there at the drop of a hat. And most of all, I thank my 11 year old daughter, Abigail, and my husband, Toby, for all the dinners they have prepared, homework they have struggled through, and keeping our household together in my absence.

As always, my door continues to be open to anyone who has concerns, questions, or issues they would like to discuss regarding our wonderful town.

______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________